Comments for Cambridge Literary Review http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:46:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 Comment on Speaking out by Aidan Semmens http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/2010/07/speaking-out/comment-page-1/#comment-24 Aidan Semmens Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:46:14 +0000 http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/?p=370#comment-24 OK - only now do I realise the lyre piece was a spoof, not the work of JC himself. Please ignore my previous post - except maybe the concluding sentence, which I imagine still applies. OK – only now do I realise the lyre piece was a spoof, not the work of JC himself. Please ignore my previous post – except maybe the concluding sentence, which I imagine still applies.

]]> Comment on CLR + Amnesty by Aidan Semmens http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/2010/08/clr-amnesty/comment-page-1/#comment-23 Aidan Semmens Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:41:33 +0000 http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/?p=376#comment-23 Did come - thoroughly enjoyed. Thank you. Glad to have met Lydia, albeit briefly, sorry not to have identified myself to Boris. Anyway, good poetry, good craic, good curry - what's not to like? :-) Did come – thoroughly enjoyed. Thank you.
Glad to have met Lydia, albeit briefly, sorry not to have identified myself to Boris.
Anyway, good poetry, good craic, good curry – what’s not to like?

:-)

]]> Comment on Speaking out by Aidan Semmens http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/2010/07/speaking-out/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Aidan Semmens Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:38:46 +0000 http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/?p=370#comment-22 Good grief - did the TLS really run that extraordinary piece of juvenile yah-boo-sucks you link to? And HE calls YOU 'little people'? Even setting aside the tedious playground 'comedy', it seems strange to brandish one's own lack of knowledge or understanding as a critical position. Your reply has all the dignity and intelligence that 'JC' appears to lack. As to why he should have written such an extraordinary attack in the first place, I can only assume a bad case of Cambridge-envy, or perhaps intellect-envy. Good grief – did the TLS really run that extraordinary piece of juvenile yah-boo-sucks you link to? And HE calls YOU ‘little people’?
Even setting aside the tedious playground ‘comedy’, it seems strange to brandish one’s own lack of knowledge or understanding as a critical position. Your reply has all the dignity and intelligence that ‘JC’ appears to lack.
As to why he should have written such an extraordinary attack in the first place, I can only assume a bad case of Cambridge-envy, or perhaps intellect-envy.

]]> Comment on CLR vs TLS by Boris Jardine http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/2010/07/clr-vs-tls/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Boris Jardine Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:04:46 +0000 http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/?p=354#comment-8 Well, The Lyre has only changed the names of certain individuals to protect their identity—so it's the same in structure and, quotations aside, content... Otherwise—I'd go into a newsagent, read it quickly and then leg it. It's a little long to transcribe here/now... Sorry! Well, The Lyre has only changed the names of certain individuals to protect their identity—so it’s the same in structure and, quotations aside, content… Otherwise—I’d go into a newsagent, read it quickly and then leg it. It’s a little long to transcribe here/now… Sorry!

]]> Comment on CLR vs TLS by nilton http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/2010/07/clr-vs-tls/comment-page-1/#comment-7 nilton Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:27:00 +0000 http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/?p=354#comment-7 Where can I read what JC actually wrote without siphoning my dole money straight to Murdoch? Where can I read what JC actually wrote without siphoning my dole money straight to Murdoch?

]]> Comment on Issue 3 by Tweets that mention Issue 3 | Cambridge Literary Review -- Topsy.com http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/vol1/issue3/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Tweets that mention Issue 3 | Cambridge Literary Review -- Topsy.com Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:36:34 +0000 http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/?page_id=333#comment-3 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by openned, Helen Slater and UK Poetry Events, Timothy Thornton. Timothy Thornton said: issue 3 of Cambridge Literary Review looks amazing, judging both by contents and cover: http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/vol1/issue3/ [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by openned, Helen Slater and UK Poetry Events, Timothy Thornton. Timothy Thornton said: issue 3 of Cambridge Literary Review looks amazing, judging both by contents and cover: http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/vol1/issue3/ [...]

]]> Comment on Winning isn’t everything by The Walton Femmes http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/2010/04/winning-isnt-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-2 The Walton Femmes Thu, 20 May 2010 23:04:39 +0000 http://www.cambridgeliteraryreview.org/?p=220#comment-2 Dear Cambridge Literally Review, Is it reigning? We noticed, hIMe: http://waltonfemmes.blogspot.com/ awl Best, the @waltonfemmes Dear Cambridge Literally Review,

Is it reigning? We noticed, hIMe:

http://waltonfemmes.blogspot.com/

awl Best,

the @waltonfemmes

]]>